These prefer the fittest individuals, but through chance allow less fit individuals to contribute to the evolution of the next generation. This is why when people are developing genetic algorithms, they use algorithms like “Tournament Selection”. There would be no evolution or innovation, as meddling would have destroyed all differences in the gene-pool, and left no room for further development. What would happen is that everyone in the population would eventually be just about as good as the best person currently existing and then… nothing. First off, from a scientific point of view, Eugenics would not lead to a better population. There are a lot of things wrong with this. But from a scientific view point it would lead to a better genetic standard if persons with low IQ and etc. This simply made Eugenics unacceptable in the long term. The only reason it stopped was due to the Nazis taking a sort of patent on their “solution”. The Eugenics movement was mostly based on facts. Indeed, and the reason it went out of control was rampant speculation, with accusations being hurled at anyone who’d even looked at a socialist pamphlet in the past. McCartyism was in the beginning reasonable and just, considering the situation, even though it went out of control later on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |